Iluminace 2018, 30(3):49-76 | DOI: 10.58193/ilu.1576

Filmmakers Versus Slovak Film Fund. Study of an Institution from the Economic Perspective and from the Perspective of Public Discourse

Miroslav Vlček
Masarykova univerzita

This study focuses on the Slovak Film Fund as a main funding option for Slovak film professionals. The film fund was created in 2009 and since then it has supported hundreds of projects: fiction movies, documentaries, animations but also reconstructions of cinemas, research project, etc. Since the beginning of the fund examples showing asymmetry in relations between filmmakers and the institution has come up and they can be traced in public discourse. This study provides deeper insight into how this discourse of asymmetry is created and how it reflects upon relations between filmmakers and the public institution of Slovak Film Fund. This discourse can also give rise to a movement that can call for the dissolution of the whole funding system as recent events indicate. This study has also shown that even clear formal criteria for choosing projects that are to be supported can in conclusion lead to a not so clear decision-making process.

Keywords: film fund, film support policies, public discourse, documentary, Slovakia

Published: September 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vlček, M. (2018). Filmmakers Versus Slovak Film Fund. Study of an Institution from the Economic Perspective and from the Perspective of Public Discourse. Iluminace30(3), 49-76. doi: 10.58193/ilu.1576
Download citation

References

  1. Martin Šmatlák, Znovu na prahu zrelosti? Slovenská kinematografia po dvoch desaťročiach (ne)samostatnosti. Kino-Ikon 18, 2014, č. 1, s. 59-62.
  2. Pavel Branko, Slovenský dokumentárny film - Generácia 90, Film.sk 5, 2004, č. 2. Dostupné online:, [cit. 4. 7. 2018].
  3. Katarína Mišíková - Mária Ferenčuhová (eds.), Nový slovenský film. Produkčné, estetické, distribučné a kritické východiská. Bratislava: Vysoká škola múzických umení, Filmová a televízna fakulta 2015.
  4. Martin Kaňuch, 1993: Lepší začiatok. Kino-Ikon 12, 2008, č. 1, s. 83-91. Go to original source...
  5. Jana Dudková a Katarína Mišíková (eds.), Transformation Processes in Post-Socialist Screen Media, Bratislava: FTF VŠMU a ÚDFV SAV 2016.
  6. Marek Urban, Identita autora. Príbehy, sociálne reprezentácie a naratívne Self v slovenskej kinematografii v rokoch 2012-2017. Bratislava: VEDA a ÚDFV SAV 2017.
  7. Manuel Avararado - Milly Buonanno - Herman Gray - Toby Miller (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Television Studies. Los Angeles: Sage Reference 2015. Dostupné online:, [cit. 1. 12. 2017]. Go to original source...
  8. James Curran (eds.), Media and Society. Londýn: Bloomsbury Academic 2010.
  9. Richard A. Peterson - Narasimhan Anand, The Production of Culture Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 30, 2004, č. 4, s. 311-334. Go to original source...
  10. Ruth Wodak - Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Londýn: Sage Publications 2002. Go to original source...
  11. Teun A. van Dijk, Discourse studies and hermeneutics. Discourse Studies 13, 2011, č. 5, s. 609-621. Go to original source...
  12. Teun A. van Dijk, Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 2006, č. 2, s. 115-140. Go to original source...
  13. Martin Kaňuch (ed.), Iluzívne a antiiluzívne vo filme. Bratislava: Asociácia slovenských filmových klubov v spolupráci so Slovenským filmovým ústavom 2018.
  14. Jana Dudková - Katarína Mišíková (eds.), Slovenský film v roku 2016. Zborník hodnotiacich príspevkov z Týždňa slovenského filmu. Bratislava: FTF VŠMU, SFTA, SFÚ 2017.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.