Iluminace 2018, 30(1):104-107

Animasophy or Private Science Without Rules (Ülo Pikkov, Animasofie: Teoretické úvahy o animovaném filmu)

Matěj Forejt

The text critically reviews Estonian animator Ülo Pikkov's book Animasofie, which, despite its ambitions to define the field theoretically and Eliška Děcká's comprehensive afterword, it considers methodologically unfounded, factually inaccurate, and, in the context of Czech professional literature, superfluous, which may paradoxically deepen mistrust of the field of animation studies.

Keywords: Ülo Pikkov, Animasofia, animated film, animation studies, Eliška Děcká

Published: March 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Forejt, M. (2018). Animasophy or Private Science Without Rules (Ülo Pikkov, Animasofie: Teoretické úvahy o animovaném filmu). Iluminace, 30(1), 104-107
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Edgar Dutka, Minimum z dějin světové animace. Praha: NAMU 2004.
    2. Edgar Dutka, Scenáristika animovaného filmu / Minimum z historie české animace. Praha: NAMU 2006.
    3. Jiří Kubíček, Úvod do estetiky animace. Praha: NAMU 2004.
    4. Jiří Plass, Základy animace. Plzeň: Nakladatelství Fraus 2009.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content